My Ten Favourite Animal Crossing Villagers

Like a lot of people, I have been playing a lot of Animal Crossing: New Horizons now that I am unable to go outside. I’ve always loved the Animal Crossing series and this is something I’ve had in the back of my mind as a blog post idea for ages, so now seems the perfect time to write about my favourite Animal Crossing villagers. Here they are, in no particular order:

Wart Jr.
When you look at him, you might feel that he’s nothing more than a grumpy little frog. In some ways, that’s what he is – but also he’s the son of Wart, the final boss of Super Mario Bros. 2. Amazing. I loved having him around my old village. Appropriate that his father lives in a dream world, because having Wart Jr. as a villager is a dream come true.

Coco
Coco is an interesting bunny. Look at that blank face – no eyes, no mouth… perhaps, no soul? You imagine that she’d be some stoic, aloof creature. But she’s not. She’s just a perfectly ordinary person. I love her. Why can’t a soulless clay doll be a regular person?

Julian
When you look at this majestic unicorn, you’re probably imagining a fabulous, soulful character. If so, you’re imagining right! His presence warms my heart and soul whenever I see him. He’s the kind of friend you wish you had in real life.

Louie
Look at him! He’s a deadringer for world famous video game star Donkey Kong. He must make a lot of bells going to swanky parties as a lookalike. What an honour it is to have him in your village. And how lucky for him that he’s so gosh darned attractive.

W. Link
Louie was cool because he looked like Donkey Kong, but W. Link is cool because he actually is Link – the hero of Hyrule. I like to imagine that after the events of The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, he found a way to return to his wolf form and then went to a peaceful village to retire. There are a few other Zelda characters as villagers too, but I decided to focus on W. Link since he’s the coolest.

Ribbot
What do you get if you cross a pun, a robot and a frog? Ribbot! He’s an actual robot. Also, he loves working out and is a massive jock. An unusual personality type for artificial intelligence. Needless to say, my child mind was blown when I had a robot come to town. Maybe he was constructed to house the soul of a jock kid who died in a street racing accident and doesn’t know he’s in a robot body?

Lucky
Lucky presents a Little John sort of situation, because rather than being lucky, it is evident that his life has been full of intense physical trauma. Either that, or he’s a deeply optimistic person who considers himself lucky to be alive and to have people who love him. Either way, I love this dog.

Octavian
I love octopuses. They’re such interesting, devious animals. Of course, I was therefore very pleased to have one come and live in my village. I realise now that it’s hard to say something unique about ten different villagers. Either way, Octavian is great.

Zucker
Speaking of octopuses, the only thing better than having a grumpy one living in your town is having a happy-go-lucky piece of living sushi come to your town. I don’t know what his deal is – maybe he’s doing to donate his body to a Japanese restaurant when he dies and is already preparing for that or maybe he’s just a reanimated piece of sushi which went on to lead a peaceful life. Either way, he gets me asking questions. I like that and I like him.

Alfonso
Last, but by no means least, is Alfonso. The friendly larger than life alligator who wears a Mario t-shirt. Since Donkey Kong lookalike Louie wears a Luigi t-shirt quite often, I like to think of Alfonso as the Kremling lookalike who works together with Louie to provide a more comprehensive experience when imitating the stars at the swanky parties they get invited to.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Posted in Video Games | Leave a comment

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Philip K. Dick

I’m a big robot fan. I always find myself drawn to them as characters and enjoy stories about them, so I was keen to try Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? due to it being an earlier exploration of the concept.

Set in the ‘future’ (the 90s), the Earth has been ravaged by nuclear war and humans have mostly abandoned the husk of a planet to go and live on Mars… but some remain. Pretty much all animals are extinct, so pets are really valuable and considered a status symbol. Those who can’t afford them buy identical android copies, but keep it quiet and pretend they’re real. Speaking of identical android copies, there are humanoid androids who are generally treated as second-class citizens.

There are two main characters: one is Rick Deckard, a police bounty hunter who comes after ‘rogue’ androids. The other is John Isidore, a man with a low-level of intelligence due to exposure to radiation, who encounters a group of other androids on the run. It’s probably not unsurprising that I preferred John out of the two of them, because I felt he was probably the more emotional and human of the two, while Rick came across as quite a blank slate who just floats through the events of the book. Perhaps this was very clever and intentional. Perhaps Rick was just badly written. That’s for you to decide.

Overall, it’s a pretty bleak book, even without the nuclear war and mass extinctions in the backstory. A lot of scenes in it were very distressing. A lot of innocent people are murdered in cold blood. It does a good job of blurring the line between android life and human life, at least. At times, it even gets very interesting and philosophical too.

Towards the end, things get very strange. It’s not very clear what really happens as the plot comes to a close, leaving room for theories and interpretation. It’s good and it’s bad in that respect – I do wish that there had been a little more closure. That goes for a lot of things. I’d like to have known what happened to the characters. I’d like to have known more about some of the side characters. But though I wish it had been fleshed out more, I still found it to be a good read and an interesting piece of sci-fi history.

Rating: 8.1/10

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Posted in Book Reviews | Leave a comment

Fictional Character Hall of Fame: The Doctor

  • Name: The Doctor
  • Origin: An Unearthly Child, Doctor Who
  • Media: Television
  • Debut: 1963

There are few fictional characters who I regard so highly as the Doctor. A figure of fun, but one who stands for strong moral ideals for which I have the greatest respect.

Although, of course, ‘The Doctor’ is a very broad term which of refers to lots of different characters (sort of) and in this blog post, I’m really talking about the sum total of them all. When we were first introduced to them in 1963, they were a mysterious time traveller who we knew little about. Over the years we discovered that they were a Time Lord from the planet Gallifrey, travelling through time and space to fight against evil and changing their appearance and personality every time they die. In recent times, we discovered that there may be even more to the character than we ever knew before.

So, why do I like them? Well, a big part of it is what they represent. In their second story, they came up against the Daleks – a representation of human fascism. The Doctor stands against oppression and violence. They want people to be safe, happy and free and fight constantly to ensure that happens. And when I say they “fight” I mean that in a violent-free way. The Doctor is a hero who champions pacifism. Brain over brawn. Kindness over cruelty. This alone is a big part of my appreciation of the character, but that’s certainly not all of it.

The Doctor is joined on their travels by their numerous companions – people who they care very dearly for. I am someone who considers friendship to be very important and The Doctor reflects the importance of friendship much more than any other fictional character. They’re largely portrayed as asexual, with very few love interests shown throughout the series, but the friendships they have over the years are shown to be just as important as any romantic relationship. At one point, the relationship they shared with a companion was described as “so much more” than being just a couple – portraying friendship as potentially more valuable than romantic love. This isn’t something I’ve seen anywhere else, but is something which will definitely be true for some people.

On top of all that, they’re an anti-establishment, progressively-minded free spirit who proves it’s okay to be different. I find the world of politics to be a depressing one, so when I see the Doctor, an ageless, powerful being who stands up for the things I agree with, it’s some really wonderful escapism. And they’re pushing boundaries in reality as well – the ides of an alien being who has had various bodies occasionally changing sex may not seem a strange one, but when you see the negative reaction of some fans towards the casting of Jodie Whittaker as the first female Doctor on the show, you realise that the character is a force for good in the worlds of fiction and reality alike. Why shouldn’t they change gender? And, for that matter, why shouldn’t anyone else?

Of course, after almost sixty years, the Doctor has been portrayed in lots of different ways. Sometimes they do things which are at odds with the ideals which I admire them for – but that’s okay. Not only do these changes throughout incarnations make the character more well-rounded, but they also ensure that there’s a version of the character for everyone. Different incarnations resonate with different fans and that’s good. I can’t wait to see what the future holds for the character. But no matter which version appears in any given story (and I won’t get into which is my favourite just now) you’ll find these qualities appearing and that is why I believe the Doctor deserves a place in my Fictional Character Hall of Fame.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Posted in Fictional Character Hall of Fame | Leave a comment

Mario Tennis

Nowadays, there seems to be a loads of Mario sports games and when a new one comes out, it usually isn’t a big deal. But when Mario Tennis was first released for the Nintendo 64, I was really excited.

I wasn’t a huge tennis fan or anything like that, but what really drew me to this game was its large cast of characters. It may not look like much compared to the rosters of later titles but back then it was really exciting. For the first time, you could control Bowser in a 3D space! You could be a Boo or a Para-Troopa. Waluigi was introduced and was a mysterious fourth ‘Mario brother’ with a slick colour scheme and devious design – I loved him then and ever since. Birdo was back for the first time in years. Good old Donkey Kong was there and he’s joined by a super cool unlockable character (whose identity I won’t spoil.) It was amazing and they’re all portrayed with such charm – especially in it’s opening cutscene.

In terms of gameplay, it’s pretty much just a solid tennis game. You work through tournaments to unlock trophies, new courts and a couple of secret characters. I think it stands up really well and will always provide a solid tennis experience.

Of course, there are also a few ‘wacky’ extras, such as a mini-game where you return tennis balls spat at you by Piranha Plants. Another has you playing on a court in Bowser’s Castle where there are items to use, much like in the Mario Kart games.

All in all, it’s among the best side games for Mario. There are a lot of hours of fun to be had, as you’re encouraged to play tournaments as every character – not just to get the trophies for all of them, but to see their unique victory celebrations when they are awarded them. There are lots of extra courts to unlock and the options to play with friends. It’s a comprehensive package and one which I still find fun to come back to every now and then.

Rating: 9.1/10

Buy it here.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Posted in Video Games | Leave a comment

The Friendship Experiment

A few months ago I thought to myself: what if two friends were trapped together in a featureless void with nothing to do but talk to each other until the end of time? Obviously, you have to imagine that they don’t need to eat or anything like that, or else the only result of this experiment would be that they would die quite quickly.

What I really wondered was would any friendship be strong enough to endure these conditions? Or would any two people eventually grow to hate one another as a result of over-exposure? I started to think that yes, any two people would start to hate each other. This made me a little sad because there are people who I’m so close with that I couldn’t imagine growing to hate, no matter what. And what would this say about the human condition? That hate always trumps love in the end?

But then, speaking to a friend of mine, he said that was not a reasonable conclusion to jump to, that putting someone in the conditions described in this experiment is tantamount to torture and all that proves is that putting people in horrible conditions makes them behave negatively. I like that. Love is stronger than hate and this hypothetic situation doesn’t say anything at odds with that.

Funnily enough, now that we’re in lockdown I guess my housemate and I are living the closest real-life equivalent of this situation. Even though we spend pretty much all of our waking hours together, no negative emotion starts to grow – and I don’t think it ever will.

What do you think of the friendship experiment?

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Posted in Lovely Things | Leave a comment

Little House in the Big Woods by Laura Ingalls Wilder

I’ve been familiar with the Little House on the Prairie television series for a long time, but it’s only very recently that I finally got around to reading any of the original books. I regret leaving it so long because Little House in the Big Woods is a fantastic read.

Sadly, when I described the book to somebody recently, they said it sounded really boring – and I can kind of see why. If what I describe does sound boring to you, please trust me that it isn’t.

The novel is based on Laura Ingalls Wilder’s own childhood, though she writes about herself in the third person. Basically, it just summarises her day to day life, back in the 1870s, when she lived in a little house deep in the woods of Wisconsin. She was just a little girl back then, living with her mother and father (Charles and Caroline) and her younger and older sisters (Mary and Carrie), one of whom was just a baby.

The Ingalls family lead a very isolated life, far removed from other people and it’s fascinating to read the tales of what they did to pass the time. You find out about games they played, food they ate, stories Laura’s father told, how they made things, their rare encounters with other people etc. I found the whole book wonderfully wholesome.

I think what’s most impressive of all is that despite the fact that Laura’s childhood was so completely different to my own, she manages to convey a nostalgia for her past which is sure to make anybody who reads feel just as nostalgic themselves. The book may not have any real tension in it, but it paints such a beautiful image of her childhood, that it doesn’t matter. It’s also pretty interesting just to learn how people lived back then.

It’s only a short book, but in the small time I spent with it, it left a very positive impact on me and I can heavily recommend it to anyone of any age.

Rating: 9/10

Buy it here.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Posted in Book Reviews | Leave a comment

Staying at Home

I’m currently in the same situation as just about everyone else at the moment: self-isolating in order to do my bit to avoid the spread of coronavirus. For me, this is quite a significant change as I am generally someone who goes out to visit friends very frequently. Being inside all the time is a little frustrating, but, actually, it’s not that bad. I’ve got plenty of books to read and video games to play – plus my housemate Sophie makes for excellent company.

It’s funny, because people seem to expect she and I to get ‘fed up’ with one another, but I find that very cynical. Maybe we don’t because we’re both pretty patient and easygoing people. Or maybe it’s just normal for friends to enjoy one another’s company.

Anyway, with this newfound time on my hands I thought to myself “Hey, why don’t I get back into my old routine of updating my webcomic and blog more often?” Well, good question, me. The reason I haven’t yet done this is that most of my ideas tended to come to me when I was out and about in the world. But who knows? Maybe I just need to get used to the new routine. I won’t be able to resume my webcomic though – for quite a few reasons. I currently don’t have access to Microsoft Paint or to my finger puppets themselves… two pretty vital components. I also don’t have the ability to go outside and take photographs for it. Alas.

Nonetheless, I will try to write more blog posts. I’ll sign off by saying that I hope everyone is wisely staying inside and avoiding unnecessary contact with others and that I hope you all are able to remain safe and well.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Posted in Current Affairs | Leave a comment

Super Smash Bros. for Wii U

I love the Super Smash Bros. series and throughout the first three installments I felt like it got better with each new game. When Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 3DS came out, I felt that despite some nice additions, it was a step down from its predecessor. I heard people say that the reason for this step down was because it was on a handheld console and that the Wii U version fixes all the issues with it. I didn’t play it for a long time, because I wasn’t that excited, but when I finally did, I felt that it was actually a further step down…

There were still things I liked though, so let’s start by talking about the positives. The game adds some pretty cool new levels. There’s a Wrecking Crew level which imagines what the levels of the game would look like in realistic HD, which is amazing. There’s a Pilotwings level which had you riding on planes which fly between the islands of the SNES original and WuHu Island from Pilotwings Resort. I love the world building that’s gone into each of these, they’re pure fan service. Speaking of WuHu Island, it’s the focus of it’s very own level, with several unique areas (such as rocks in the ocean, a rickety bridge and the top of a volcano). I also liked new ones based on Donkey Kong Country Returns and The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword as well. Overall, the level selection was quite good, which I did think was a weakness in the 3DS game.

I do also like the selection of characters. Duck Hunt Duo are a fantastic addition, Pac-Man is really fun to be, Lucina and Robin was super cool, Villager is a perfect representative of the Animal Crossing series, Wii Fit Trainer is fun and hilarious, it’s nice to have Dr. Mario and Mewtwo back (even if the latter is DLC) and Bowser Jr. is a really fun and unique character, classics like Donkey Kong, Mr. Game & Watch and Link have all returned too… but it’s hard to be that excited by the characters, since they’re exactly the same as they were in the 3DS game and by the time I played this, I’d already spent lots of hours playing as them all.

And that’s the problem with the game overall. It didn’t feel new. I played the 3DS game a lot and got as much fun out of it as I could, then when I played this one, it just felt like more of the same – except, other than a nice new selection of levels, it’s actually less of the same. For some reason, the fun new Smash Run of the 3DS game is replaced with Smash Tour – a mode where Miis walk around a game board (Mario Party-style) and then get into fights with each other where everyone plays as random character under random conditions. I played it once or twice and will never play it again. It was not fun.

The single player Classic Mode also feels worse – the random assortment of characters you fought (sometimes up to eight at once – far too many, it’s just chaos) just feel like a bunch of Nintendo characters haphazardly thrown together and made to fight. In fact – that sums up the game overall: a bunch of Nintendo stuff randomly thrown together. It has some nice elements, but overall I didn’t think this game was well executed.

Rating: 6.4/10

Buy it here.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Posted in Video Games | Leave a comment

The Friendship That Never Was

I like to stay in touch with people. If I form any kind of significant bond with someone, I’ll never stop reaching out to them to meet up and have fun together. The two very best friends I had in primary school (Davey and George, their names are) remain in my life to this day and although our meeting are significantly less frequent, I continue to count them among my very best friends.

But sometimes it’s interesting to think about how things could have been different. I remember around age four or five, I had another best friend as well who was called Tammy. My mother insists that she was my girlfriend (whatever that is to a five year old), but I don’t remember the friendship being anything like that – but who knows? I was a five year old, after all, so my memory won’t be great.

I can remember going to school together, visiting her house, her visiting mine, playing Donkey Kong Country together, drawing pictures together and other fragmented memories. Then eventually I found out she was moving away and before long she was gone and I never saw her again. Prior to it happening, I don’t remember being sad at the news, but I don’t think I yet had the emotional capacity. I do remember feeling a bit sad a few weeks later though, when I realised just what it’s like when somebody goes away.

And I recently stopped to wonder; what if she hadn’t moved away? I’d most likely have another lifelong friend. I’d have had another person influencing me and my development throughout the last twenty years. I’d have had another person to share two decades of experiences with. I’d probably be a slightly different person because of this addition to my life.

It makes me realise how lucky I am to have the friends who I have known since those early days. If they’d had moved away, I’d have lost something really quite significant and I’m not entirely sure that my childhood self would have been able to comprehend what exactly they had lost, but my life would surely be set onto a different path…

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Posted in Thoughts | Leave a comment

Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell

The current political climate is one that’s incredibly depressing. Often you’ll hear people saying this or that is Orwellian and it’s the government of Ninteen Eighty-Four that they’re referring to. Although I knew generally what the book was about, I recently decided to read the book to find out just how prophetic George Orwell had been back in 1948.

The story follows the everyday life of a man named Winston, who has a job revising records to allign themselves with the narrative of the government (or The Party, as they call themselves). We learn that people disappear for saying or doing things not in-line with The Party’s philosophy and anyone who mentions the people who have disappeared will then disappear themselves. We learn that people have to take part in mandatory things such as “Two Minutes Hate” where views counter to those of The Party are vilified. We learn that history is constantly revised so that The Party never appears to have been wrong. We learn that endless wars are waged and nobody knows why or to what end.

Although every aspect of The Party’s rule is disturbing, it’s Newspeak which was the most unsettling. In order to eradicate all opposition, they slowly introduce a language called Newspeak, which is a greatly simplified version of English where opposing ideas simply cannot be explained as there are no words to do so. Though English still exists at the time the novel is set, you know that they are planning for it to be completely replaced in the not too distant future. Even classic works of literature are translated into it.

Thankfully, of course, no real-life government is currently quite as bad as this, but there are certainly uncomfortable parallels. The Party uses Mass Surveillance to ensure complete conformity of all its citizens and, with modern technology, we know very well that systems are in place which could make that possible. The lies and misinformation of The Party also bear some resemblance to the increasingly dishonest political discourse of our politicians. They’re gaslighting people, essentially and it makes me very uneasy when we see such clear contradictions and lies used by the people in power in the real world… Plus, there’s the way The Party is so tied up with nationalism that it presents other opinions as being against the state itself. It’s all a little eerily familiar isn’t it?

But despite the fact that Orwell has given us a very enlightened warning about the future of politics, there was something that rather took away from the book as a whole. He seems to have rather negative views on women. The women in the novel are all portrayed as rather simple minded and not able to truly comprehend (or care about) the extent to which The Party’s actions are frightening and harmful. I know people will say “but this was the 1940s, it’s a product of its times” but I won’t accept that – I’ve seen much more positive portrayals of women in novels written much earlier, so there’s no excuse for this misogyny.

Overall, although the sexism did make me uncomfortable a number of times, I’d still say that this is a good book and one that’s well worth reading. It’s thought provoking and interesting… but at the same time it is quite depressing. If you find current politics upsetting, this might just reinforce your worries and make you feel even worse, so if you are going to read, brace yourself!

Rating: 8.3/10

Buy it here.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Posted in Book Reviews | Leave a comment